Two GA congressmen change vote on bailout

Two of Georgia’s house members changed their vote today in support of the 700 billion dollar bailout package. Georgia’s seven Republicans in the U.S. House knows as the G7 held the line. They voted no on the bailout. That vote is in contrast to Georgia’s Republican Senators. Both of them supported the package.

Representative Lynn Westmoreland issued a statement saying he voted no on Monday because the package was the wrong approach to the financial crisis. Today he says he voted no because it was the same package with "sweeteners added to attract votes."

Democrat David Scott was one who changed his mind, saying enough provisions were added to prevent more foreclosures.

And Representative John Lewis told his colleagues "the fear that is gripping Wall Street has the power to shut down Main street." He said "the people are afraid."

Westmoreland calls Obama 'uppity'

Georgia’s Democratic Party wants Georgia Republican congressman Lynn Westmoreland to apologize for calling Barak Obama “uppity.”

The Washington newspaper “The Hill,” reports that Westmoreland used the word when describing Obama and his wife as members of an elitist class.

A spokesman for Westmorland says the congressman was using the dictionary meaning of the word and was unaware of additional racial context.

Georgia’s Democratic Party chair Jane Kidd called the comments in a statement insensitive at best and urged Westmoreland to apologize.

According to the newspaper, Obama campaign took no racial offense.

Click here for more GPB News political coverage.

Georgia lawmakers back Bush on drilling

Georgia lawmakers largely support President Bush's call to lift a long-standing ban on offshore oil drilling, including off the state's coast.

All nine of Georgia's Republican congressmen, including both senators, back the proposal. Three of six Democrats also support it, along with Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue.

The new push for drilling is a response to increasingly urgent complaints from constituents about $4-a-gallon gasoline.

Many experts, including Energy Department forecasters, predict that offshore supplies would amount to a drop in the global bucket and would have little effect on gas prices. But drilling supporters say no one really knows how much oil is out there and that Congress can no longer ignore it.

"People all too often want to say ... 'not in my backyard.' But as a nation in a fuel crisis, we simply cannot afford to take any option off the table," said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Marietta. "We're not talking about setting up an oil rig on the sandbar where you collect seashells. We're talking about responsible exploration."

President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban that his father put in place in 1990 that prohibits offshore drilling in most parts of the country. He is pressing Congress to lift a similar legislative ban.

Based on studies done 25 years ago, the Interior Department estimates that 18 billion barrels of recoverable oil likely will be found beneath coastal waters now off limits. The U.S. consumes about 8 billion barrels per year.

In a report last year, the Energy Department forecasting arm said it would take until 2030 before offshore production really got going. Even then, the report said, "because oil prices are determined on the international market ... any impact on average wellhead prices is expected to be insignificant."

Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Lithonia, said the benefits are "not worth the risk."

"Every week I advise constituents that there is no easy fix and we will not be returning to the era of cheap gas and oil," he said.

Rep. David Scott, D-Atlanta, said that while he might support limited new coastal drilling — such as what Congress opened recently in the Gulf of Mexico — Republicans are missing the point by focusing on oil.

"We must find substitutes for oil and natural gas so that crises such as this do not occur again," he said.

But Scott and Johnson are in the minority among Georgia lawmakers, along with Rep. John Lewis, D-Atlanta, who has long opposed new drilling.

The rest of the delegation backs offshore development, including Democrats John Barrow of Savannah, Sanford Bishop of Albany and Jim Marshall of Macon.

Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, who have been trying to broker a bipartisan energy compromise recently, said Congress can no longer ignore potential resources. Even if offshore production would play only a bit part in a broad energy portfolio, Isakson said, making it available would influence market forces that are driving up prices.

"Those who speculate on the future prices would understand that the United States has finally had enough," he said on the Senate floor Tuesday.

Supporters also say oil rigs would be so far off the coast that beachgoers wouldn't see them.

Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Grantville, said the new production also could become a major revenue source for the state, as it has been in Louisiana and other Gulf states, which get a share of government royalties.

Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Savannah, said domestic production is "step one."

"It's just like dieting we need to reduce intake and increase output," he said.

Click here for more GPB News coverage of the gas crisis and energy issues.

(The Associated Press)

President Carter speaks out for Flint River

More than 100 river enthusiasts wrapped up a trip down the Flint River, vowing to fight any effort to change things downstream.

The Flint River begins as a spring, just under Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. From there the river travels more than 200 miles into South Georgia. There is meets up with the Chatahoochee.

In recent months Congressmen Nathan Deal and Lynn Westmoreland have discussed building new dams on the Flint to feed reservoirs. Westmoreland is asking for 10-million dollars to study the idea. Environmentalists are against it.

Former President, Jimmy Carter fought against building dams on the Flint in the 1970's. He joined paddlers in Oglethorpe as they wrapped up a week long trip on the Flint and warned them about what lies ahead.

"You ought to prepare for a massive fight because the Chambers of Commerce, and the promise of employment and the promise of recreation and in this case the promise of more water somehow getting into Atlanta and taking pressure off Lake Lanier. All of those are going to be put forward and you need to be organized and willing to work on it and prepared."

Officials with the Georgia River Network also announced the formation of the Flint Riverkeeper. This is the 7th protection group in Georgia formed under the Waterkeeper Alliance.