Five cities in Gwinnett County are stopping the use of red light cameras at busy intersections, saying they are too costly even though they have reduced accidents.
Norcross and Suwanee have removed the cameras, Snellville and Lilburn have suspended their programs for study and Duluth says it won't renew its lease when it expires in May.
The cameras monitor and record red light violations.
By summer only one government in Gwinnett will still be using the cameras - the county government.
Officials say the cameras are working, with violations, accidents and injuries all down. But the program can cost cities $400,000 a year and the number of citations have dwindled since a state law mandates a one-second addition to the yellow phase at all camera intersections.
(AP)
GPB News Archive
GPB's News site has MOVED!
Check out our completely redesigned webpage at
for the latest in local and statewide Georgia news!
Search This Blog
Blog Archive:
Showing posts with label red light cameras. Show all posts
Showing posts with label red light cameras. Show all posts
Sunday, March 15, 2009
5 Gwinnett Cities to Stop Using Red Light Cameras
Posted by
Dave
at
3/15/2009 11:58:00 AM
Labels: Duluth, Lilburn, Norcross, red light cameras, Snellville, Suwanee, traffic tickets
Friday, March 21, 2008
State Senate approves red light camera measure
The state Senate approved a bill Thursday that makes it tougher for local governments to use red light cameras as a revenue generator.
For the second time in as many weeks, debate over the measure banning red light cameras was fiercely contested. This time some lawmakers sought to attach an amendment that allocates a portion of the fines toward trauma care. However, some feared the entire bill faced certain death if tied to trauma care funding.
Senate President Pro Tem Eric Johnson had backed a proposal to fund trauma care with an additional car tag fee. He urged his colleagues to support the bill but reject the trauma care amendment.
"If you wanna do something for trauma, let's do it the right way and not the wrong way. If you vote for this, and people think they've fixed the trauma problem, they haven't and it'll make it harder to pass the 10-dollar fee for trauma care".
The trauma care amendment failed but the bill did pass the Senate 45-13. It requires local municipalities apply to the Department of Transportation for permission to install any new red light cameras. It also mandates the cameras be necessary for public safety and not to raise money.
--from Valarie Edwards at the Capitol
For the second time in as many weeks, debate over the measure banning red light cameras was fiercely contested. This time some lawmakers sought to attach an amendment that allocates a portion of the fines toward trauma care. However, some feared the entire bill faced certain death if tied to trauma care funding.
Senate President Pro Tem Eric Johnson had backed a proposal to fund trauma care with an additional car tag fee. He urged his colleagues to support the bill but reject the trauma care amendment.
"If you wanna do something for trauma, let's do it the right way and not the wrong way. If you vote for this, and people think they've fixed the trauma problem, they haven't and it'll make it harder to pass the 10-dollar fee for trauma care".
The trauma care amendment failed but the bill did pass the Senate 45-13. It requires local municipalities apply to the Department of Transportation for permission to install any new red light cameras. It also mandates the cameras be necessary for public safety and not to raise money.
--from Valarie Edwards at the Capitol
Posted by
Edgar Treiguts
at
3/21/2008 08:12:00 AM
Labels: red light cameras, State House, State senate, trauma care
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)